The silence from Lance Twiggs’ family has finally broken, weeks after the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk. For the first time, relatives are publicly addressing their connection to the case and the man accused of the crime, Tyler Robinson.
On September 10, 2025, a single gunshot shattered the atmosphere at Utah Valley University, claiming the life of Charlie Kirk. Authorities swiftly arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, leveling seven serious charges, including aggravated murder.
The investigation quickly revealed a crucial detail: Robinson lived with Lance “Luna” Twiggs, a transgender woman. This relationship became a focal point as investigators pieced together the events leading up to the assassination.
Federal investigators honed in on text messages exchanged between Robinson and Twiggs, believing they held the key to understanding Robinson’s motives and confirming his role in the shooting. These communications reportedly solidified the case against him.
While Twiggs has not been charged with any crime, his immediate disappearance following Robinson’s arrest raised questions. For weeks, he was reportedly under FBI protection, a detail confirmed by a family member speaking with a national news correspondent.
The family member revealed that Twiggs initially left the state, seeking distance from the unfolding investigation. He has since returned to his family home in St. George, Utah, and is now described as “cooperating” with law enforcement.
When directly asked if she believed Robinson was responsible for Kirk’s death, Twiggs’ relative offered a stark and unwavering response: “100%. They have the right guy.” Her conviction speaks to the family’s understanding of the situation and their trust in the investigation.
The charges against Robinson paint a grim picture of premeditation and a desperate attempt to conceal evidence. He faces a capital offense for aggravated murder, alongside charges for reckless discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice.
Further accusations include tampering with a witness – specifically, pressuring Twiggs to delete incriminating messages and remain silent to investigators. The severity of the charges is compounded by the fact that the violent act occurred in the presence of a child.
The family member also hinted at the difficulty investigators faced in securing Twiggs’ cooperation initially, stating, “I know they said he was cooperative, but they had to go get him.” This suggests a reluctance to come forward and a potential awareness of the gravity of the situation.
